MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

NUC Optimization Design for Multi-layer Layered Division Multiplexing

2024· article· en· W4401163897 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDivision (mathematics)Computer scienceMultiplexingTime-division multiplexingLayer (electronics)Materials scienceTelecommunicationsComposite materialMathematicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Layered Division Multiplexing (LDM) is a powerbased non-orthogonal multiplexing (NOM) technology used in Advanced Television System Committee (ATSC) 3.0 next generation TV standard. To improve the performance of the multi-layer LDM system, this paper proposes a low-complexity scheme that optimizes the injection level and non-uniform constellation (NUC) to approach the capacity. The computable integral form of the bit interleaved coded modulation (BICM) capacity is derived for the multi-layer LDM. The injection levels are first optimized with the help of the BICM capacity formula. The NUCs are optimized layer by layer from the lower layer to the upper layer based on the optimized injection levels to maximize the BICM capacity. Simulation results show that the injection levels and NUCs obtained by the proposed scheme perform excellently and provide as much as 0.8 dB gain for the middle layers in the LDM system, compared with ATSC 3.0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it