Penerepan Analisis Diskriminan Kuadratik Robust Pada Klasifikasi Desa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discriminant analysis is a method used in separating objects into different groups and allocating objects into a predetermined group. Discriminant analysis is bound by the assumption that the mean vector for each group is different, the data is normally distributed multivariate and the covariance variance matrix between groups is the same. If there is a covariance variance matrix between different groups, then quadratic discriminant analysis is used for the classification process. However, sometimes it is found that data contains outliers, so a robust estimator is used, namely the Minimun Covariance Determinant with the fast-MCD algorithm. Therefore, robust quadratic discriminant analysis can be used to classify 128 villages and 48 sub-districts in Wajo district. It was found that 106 villages were correctly classified into village groups and 22 villages were misclassified into sub-district groups and 35 sub-districts were correctly classified as sub-district groups and 13 sub-districts were misclassified into village groups and produced an accuracy of classification results of 80.11%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it