MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401207504 · doi:10.1007/s42532-024-00192-y

Scaling up in community forest enterprises: the case of central Mexico

2024· article· en· W4401207504 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-Ecological Practice Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoKey Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Sichuan ProvinceUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México
KeywordsBusinessForest managementSustainabilityNatural resource economicsEcoforestryInvestment (military)Environmental resource managementEconomicsForest ecologyEcologyGeographyPolitical scienceForestryEcosystemIntact forest landscape

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For community forest enterprises (CFEs) in central Mexico, ‘scaling up’ can be an effective means of achieving the transition to economically attractive and sustainable forest management, but little is known about the potential and challenges that they face in this regard. We used a qualitative case study to evaluate a set of variables that determine the limitations and opportunities for scaling up CFEs in central Mexico and thereby expanding their commercial capacities, activities and outputs. The framework included concepts related to sustainable forest management, natural resource governance and temperate forest ecology. We interviewed leaders of four communities ( n = 30) and 15 external actors (regional industry, and national non-governmental organizations). Communities that had developed long-term plans for forest management that embrace conservation values were also those with the greatest capacity to generate sustainable income streams from diverse sources. The robust legal frameworks and community institutions that set up procedures for responsibly harvesting and selling timber, thereby generating income, offer opportunities to enhance the effectiveness of CFEs. Demand continues to grow for wood products involving skilled crafts in central Mexico, but local production remains low; a lack of access to finance imposes limits on investment in the forests and value-added options for the products and services. Market opportunities and growth are also restricted by substandard physical infrastructure (e.g., roads, electricity) limited access to finance (e.g., credit, private-sector investors), and an absence of business plans. There are no formal networks to facilitate learning among these CFEs. Scaling up for these CFEs will require access to markets, innovations, and finance to create sustainable value chains for wood and non-wood forest products. The Mexican government could be instrumental in this by incorporating the notion of scaling up for CFEs when enacting policy that builds on and supports the country’s proven models of community-based forest management. On the other hand, this approach can be useful for developing more robust theoretical and methodological frameworks that capture these complex dynamics, contribute to the theory and practice of enterprise forestry development, sustainable natural resource management, and effective policy formulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it