MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401247225 · doi:10.1109/tie.2024.3429629

Adaptive Velocity and Acceleration Control of Autonomous Vehicle Systems

2024· article· en· W4401247225 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAccelerationAdaptive controlVehicle dynamicsControl systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringControl (management)Automotive engineeringEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a combined adaptive velocity and acceleration control (CAVAC) law for autonomous vehicles in the presence of uncertainties and nonlinearities. In particular, the global asymptotic stability of the nonlinear vehicle system under the proposed adaptive velocity control is shown to hold without real-time estimation of the vehicle parameters. Moreover, the CAVAC law is shown to achieve the string stability against energy bounded disturbances, and ensures the required intervehicle spacing, crucial to avoiding collisions in vehicle platoons. The simulation studies illustrate the advantages of the CAVAC law for the autonomous vehicle platoon in dealing with the speed limit changes, in mitigating issues induced by merging-exiting, in suppressing energy bounded disturbances, and in improving collision avoidance. The experiments on an electric vehicle (EV) validate the effectiveness of the proposed control laws.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it