MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401260612 · doi:10.1016/j.fraope.2024.100140

Analytical design of modified Smith predictor for second-order stable time delay plants incorporating a zero

2024· article· en· W4401260612 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFranklin Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)PID controllerLagSmith predictorComputer scienceControl signalRobust controlControl engineeringControl systemEngineeringTemperature controlControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simplified control tuning not only enhances engineers' proficiency in control theory and its application but also contributes to their skill development. This study focuses on the control of stable second-order plus time delay (SOPTD) plants incorporating a zero, by employing a modified Smith predictor structure. A forward path PID controller and a PID controller with a lead/lag filter in the feedback path contribute to the proposed control system. The PID controller determines the set-point tracking. The load disturbance rejection is influenced by both the PID and lead/lag filter. Each controller is simply designed using pole placement, while considering a tuning parameter to make a balance between performance and robustness. Filtering of the set-point signal is implemented to enhance its response. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed technique, the study involves examining a SOPTD plant and either a negative or a positive zero. Simulation and comparison analysis show that the proposed controller is appropriate for industrial usage since it quickly tracks the set-point and efficiently rejects disturbances, resulting in a smooth control signal. Furthermore, robustness tests reveal its satisfactory degree of robustness against model parameter uncertainties. In summary, the proposed approach is straightforward and outperforms recently published design methodologies in terms of both performance and robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it