MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401267147 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35249

Specific spectral sub-images for machine learning evaluation of optical differences between carbon ion and X ray radiation effects

2024· article· en· W4401267147 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationEuropean Regional Development FundInstitutul National de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Fizica si Inginerie Nucleara 'Horia Hulubei'Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si InovariiCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesMinisterul Cercetării, Inovării şi Digitalizării
KeywordsRadiationCarbon fibersIonOpticsMaterials scienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in radiotherapy, particularly the exploration of alternative radiation types such as carbon ions have updated our understanding of its effects and applicability on chondrosarcoma cells. Here we compare the optical effects produced by carbon ions (CI) and X-rays (XR) radiations on chondrosarcoma cells nuclei and set an automated method for evaluating the radiation-induced alterations without the need of chemical marking. Hyperspectral images (HSI) of SW1353 chondrosarcoma line carry detectable optical changes of the cells irradiated either with CI or XR compared to non-irradiated ones (REF). The differences between the spectral profiles of CI, XR and REF nuclei classes led to partitioning the HSIs into spectral sub-images. The changes are detected by support vector machine (SVM) classifiers whose performances are evaluated by the most used point metrics: sensitivity ( SEN ), accuracy ( ACC ), and precision ( PREC ), applied on spatial feature values. Specific interaction mechanisms by radiation type reveal distinct subintervals where HSIs changes are more prominent, and the classifiers perform at best. For CI the best classifiers are obtained for sub-images in the interval (424–436 nm), while for XR the best classifiers are obtained for sub-images in the interval (436–445 nm). The classifiers work better with texture features than roughness features in both cases. The classifier with the best SEN point metric in the testing phase is the most suitable to measure the irradiation efficiency irrespective of the radiation type. The altered nuclei are easier to discriminate when irradiated with CI than with XR. The study proves that SVM with optical data offers a rapid, automated, and label-free method for evaluating radiation-induced alterations in chondrosarcoma nuclei, thereby enabling effective analysis of extensive data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it