Physics‐informed neural networks guided modelling and multiobjective optimization of a <scp>mAb</scp> production process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we aim to correlate various process and product quality attributes of a mammalian cell culture process with process parameters. To achieve this, we employed physics‐informed neural networks that solve the governing ordinary differential equations comprising independent variables (inputs‐ time, flow rates, and volume) and dependent variables (outputs‐ viable cell density, dead cell density, glucose concentration, lactate concentration, and monoclonal antibody concentration). The proposed model surpasses the prediction and accuracy capabilities of other commonly used modelling approaches, such as the multilayer perceptron model. It has higher R ‐squared ( R 2 ), lower root mean square error, and lower mean absolute error than the multilayer perceptron model for all output variables (viable cell density, viability, glucose concentration, lactate concentration, and monoclonal antibody concentration). Furthermore, we incorporate a Bayesian optimization study to maximize viable cell density and monoclonal antibody concentration. Single objective optimization and weighted sum multiobjective optimization were carried out for viable cell density and monoclonal antibody concentration in separate (single objective optimization) and combined (multiobjective optimization) forms. An increment of 13.01% and 18.57% for viable cell density and monoclonal antibody concentration, respectively, were projected under single objective optimization, and 46.32% and 67.86%, respectively, for multiobjective optimization as compared to the base case. This study highlights the potential of the physics‐informed neural networks‐based modelling and optimization of upstream processing of mammalian cell‐based monoclonal antibodies in biopharmaceutical operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it