On the Performance of Rate Splitting Multiple Access for ISAC in Device-to-Multi-Device IoT Communications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the performance of rate splitting multiple access (RSMA) technique for a multi-device communication system applying integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) to alleviate the problem of overlapping spectrum of radar signal and communication frequency bands. The system includes a cooperative access point (AP) which serves as a sensing node and a decode-and-forward (DF) relay to support the communication between a mobile device (MD) and multiple Internet-of-Things devices (IoDs). Assuming Nakagami fading channels, we provide an extensive analytical framework to evaluate the dual functionalities of the system considering various scenarios with different assumptions on blocklength, channel state information (CSI), and successive interference cancellation (SIC). In other words, we consider both infinite and finite blocklength transmissions under practical impairments including imperfect CSI and SIC. We investigate the outage probability (OP), and ergodic sum rate assuming infinite blocklength, while the block error rate (BLER), and goodput are analyzed in the finite blocklength regime. The closed-form and asymptotic expressions for the OP and BLER are presented. In addition, to evaluate the sensing performance, we derive the closed-form expressions of the false alarm and detection probabilities. Through the simulation results, we validate our analysis and delve into the impacts of various system parameters including transmit power, Nakagami shaping parameter, CSI error, SIC imperfection, the number of devices, and sensing threshold. Further, we observe that the proposed RSMA-based ISAC system provides higher ergodic sum rates compared to non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) both in the presence and absence of practical impairments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it