MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transformer-Based Semantic SBERT Robot with CI Mechanism for Students and Machine Co-Learning

2024· article· en· W4401338347 on OpenAlexaff
Chang-Shing Lee, Mei‐Hui Wang, Chih‐Yu Chen, Yu-Hsiang Lee, Guan-Ying Tseng, Sheng-Chi Yang, Marek Reformat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRobotTransformerArtificial intelligenceMechanism (biology)Machine learningHuman–computer interactionNatural language processingEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a transformer-based semantic robot with a computational intelligence (CI) mechanism designed for use in an educational co-learning environment, where teachers, teaching assistants, and students interact with the CI robot and attention ontology to enhance the learning process. The approach is applied in two distinct applications. The first, focusing on student-machine co-learning with writing performance evaluation, involves an attention-based mechanism for curating learning content from students, which is further refined by a preprocessing mechanism with expert-based fuzzy numbers. The second, concentrating on student-machine co-learning with speaking performance evaluation, introduces a Meta AI Universal Speech Translator (UST) Taiwanese/English agent that translates content into English and Taiwanese speeches, as well as into English and Chinese texts. This transformer-based robot for computing semantic similarities employs a trained semantic Sentence-BERT (SBERT) model to analyze student-machine co-learning contents. Given the large size of the co-learning content with the ontology model, we implement a chunk-based approach for processing. This method enables effective comparison of the extensive student-provided learning content with the evaluative content from teachers and teaching assistants. Additionally, a Human Intelligence (HI)-based robot, equipped with a CI assessment mechanism based on fuzzy numbers, evaluates performance and adjusts the evaluation content of teachers and teaching assistants based on HI fuzzy numbers. Experimental results indicate that the proposed CI robot can reduce teachers' burden and objectively evaluate student-machine co-learning performance, thereby narrowing the gap in actual student-machine co-learning performance. Furthermore, it aids in assessing student-machine co-learning performance and understanding, creating a more personalized and effective learning environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Automated SystemsFrench-language works237,207