MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401415607 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3440314

Improving EKF-Based IMU/GNSS Fusion Using Machine Learning for IMU Denoising

2024· article· en· W4401415607 on OpenAlexafffund
Rohan Kumar Reddy Damagatla, Mohamed Atia

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInertial measurement unitGNSS applicationsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceExtended Kalman filterSensor fusionInertial navigation systemUnits of measurementKalman filterGlobal Positioning SystemComputer visionGyroscopeEngineeringInertial frame of referenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the realm of navigation systems, Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors play a pivotal role. The advent of Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) sensors has introduced a lightweight and cost-effective alternative for IMUs. However, MEMS IMUs come with the challenge of larger stochastic errors that accumulate over time, resulting in navigation drifts. To address this issue, the conventional approach involves fusing IMU with the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) for reliable navigation. Nevertheless, this fusion setup fails in providing ubiquitous navigation during GNSS outage scenarios due to persistent IMU errors. In this paper, an efficient methodology is developed to mitigate navigation drifts by eliminating IMU errors using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. In contrast to existing methodologies that employ high-end and expensive IMUs for training models to denoise low-cost MEMS IMUs, this paper proposes utilizing Inverse Kinematics (IK). This approach helps to derive clean IMU training data from the Position, Velocity, Attitude (PVA) values estimated through the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) when GNSS is available and reliable. The distinctive advantage of the IK approach lies in its capacity to obtain real-time pseudo error-free IMU data without the necessity for high-end IMUs to train ML models. The proposed method undergoes testing in both Loosely coupled and Tightly coupled EKF scenarios using simulation and real dataset under varying GNSS outage durations. Comparisons are made between the denoised IMU signals and signal processing techniques such as Moving Average (MA) and Savitzky Golay (SG). Additionally, we present a comparative analysis of the proposed algorithms against Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Results demonstrate a noteworthy enhancement in position, velocity, and orientation estimation. Furthermore, the computation time required for model training and prediction across various algorithms is analyzed. The outcomes prove the superiority of the proposed tree-based algorithms over the conventional filtering methods and CNN in denoising IMU and improving the navigation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207