MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401415607 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3440314

Improving EKF-Based IMU/GNSS Fusion Using Machine Learning for IMU Denoising

2024· article· en· W4401415607 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInertial measurement unitGNSS applicationsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceExtended Kalman filterSensor fusionInertial navigation systemUnits of measurementKalman filterGlobal Positioning SystemComputer visionGyroscopeEngineeringInertial frame of referenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the realm of navigation systems, Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors play a pivotal role. The advent of Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) sensors has introduced a lightweight and cost-effective alternative for IMUs. However, MEMS IMUs come with the challenge of larger stochastic errors that accumulate over time, resulting in navigation drifts. To address this issue, the conventional approach involves fusing IMU with the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) for reliable navigation. Nevertheless, this fusion setup fails in providing ubiquitous navigation during GNSS outage scenarios due to persistent IMU errors. In this paper, an efficient methodology is developed to mitigate navigation drifts by eliminating IMU errors using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. In contrast to existing methodologies that employ high-end and expensive IMUs for training models to denoise low-cost MEMS IMUs, this paper proposes utilizing Inverse Kinematics (IK). This approach helps to derive clean IMU training data from the Position, Velocity, Attitude (PVA) values estimated through the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) when GNSS is available and reliable. The distinctive advantage of the IK approach lies in its capacity to obtain real-time pseudo error-free IMU data without the necessity for high-end IMUs to train ML models. The proposed method undergoes testing in both Loosely coupled and Tightly coupled EKF scenarios using simulation and real dataset under varying GNSS outage durations. Comparisons are made between the denoised IMU signals and signal processing techniques such as Moving Average (MA) and Savitzky Golay (SG). Additionally, we present a comparative analysis of the proposed algorithms against Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Results demonstrate a noteworthy enhancement in position, velocity, and orientation estimation. Furthermore, the computation time required for model training and prediction across various algorithms is analyzed. The outcomes prove the superiority of the proposed tree-based algorithms over the conventional filtering methods and CNN in denoising IMU and improving the navigation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it