MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401445685 · doi:10.1177/17442591241266553

Improved mesoscopic meteorological modeling of the urban climate for building physics applications

2024· article· en· W4401445685 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Building Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoscale meteorologyMesoscopic physicsParametrization (atmospheric modeling)MeteorologyEnvironmental scienceUrban heat islandClimate modelUrban climateClimatologyComputer scienceClimate changeGeographyUrban planningCivil engineeringEngineeringGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meteorological mesoscale models with different urban parametrization are used to predict the local urban climate at 250 m resolution. The authors propose a hybrid machine learning approach to improve the mesoscale prediction accuracy using measured air temperature data from a sensor network and remove simulation bias. The simulation of the urban climate of Zurich during a hot summer is used as case study showing the improvements of the simulation accuracy. Based on the hybrid model results, a cumulative heat exposure index is proposed to map local hotspots in the city and assess the difference of cooling loads between rural and urban environments. Furthermore, intra-urban microclimatic differences of a typical mid-latitude city are explored to highlight the benefits of detailed simulations for building physics purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it