MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401465931 · doi:10.1016/j.geomat.2024.100009

Quantifying forest degradation rates and their drivers in Alle district, southwestern Ethiopia: Implications for sustainable forest management practices

2024· article· en· W4401465931 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOMATICA · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainable forest managementForest managementSustainable managementForest degradationGeographyAgroforestrySustainable developmentEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceForestryEnvironmental protectionSustainabilityLand degradationEcologyAgricultureArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forest ecosystems contribute significantly to global climate regulation. Nonetheless, vulnerability has emerged as a multifaceted topic in the scientific world. Despite the importance of forest ecosystem services, there has been little quantification of worldwide forest change. The main objective of this study was to quantify forest degradation rates and drivers in the Alle district in Southwest Ethiopia. A mixed-research design was used to collect data on forest degradation rates and drivers in Alle district, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative method. The Land Use/Cover (LULC) for 1990, 2010, and 2022 derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) and Landsat Operational Land Imager (OLI) were used to detect changes and rates of forest degradation. Using a simple random sampling technique, 284 respondents were selected and questionnaires, interviews, and field observations were used to collect survey data. The results indicated that the forest cover of Abidibor per hectare was 2467.5 ha (97.2 %), 2268.3 ha (89.4 %) and 2203.9 ha (86.8 %) during 1990, 2010, and 2022, respectively. The forest coverage of Aba Gamta was 8296.7 ha (96.7 %), 6796.9 ha (79.2 %), and 6654.5 ha (77.6 %) in 1990, 2010, and 2022, respectively. Agricultural and grazing land increased, whereas forests and wetlands decreased during the respective years. The majority (39.36 %) of the sampled respondents reported that the conversion of forest land to agriculture by a rapidly growing population resulted in the expansion of agricultural land and rural settlements, resulting in forest degradation manifested by deforestation, overgrazing, and overexploitation. Thus, the forest coverage of the area decreased rapidly with time. As a solution to the devastating problems of diminishing forests, the local government and other stakeholders should consider conserving and managing depreciating forests by controlling direct drivers and determinants through participatory and institutionalized mechanisms. • Forest cover has dramatically declined over the last three decades, specifically Abidibor and Aba Gamta areas. • Conversion of forest land to agriculture, overgrazing, and overexploitation were identified as primary drivers. • Expansion of agricultural land and rural settlements contributes to the decline in forest coverage. • Institutionalized and participative approaches to forest management and protection were emphasized. • The local government and stakeholders have to move promptly to address the root causes of forest degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it