Hybrid deep learning for design of nanophotonic quantum emitter lenses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Inverse design of nanophotonic structures has allowed unprecedented control over light. These design processes however are accompanied with challenges, such as their high sensitivity to initial conditions, computational expense, and complexity in integrating multiple design constraints. Machine learning approaches, however, show complementary strengths, allowing huge sample sets to be generated nearly instantaneously, and with transfer learning, allowing modifications in design parameters to be integrated with limited retraining. Herein we investigate a hybrid deep learning approach, leveraging the accuracy and performance of adjoint-based topology optimization to produce a high-quality training set for a convolutional generative network. We specifically explore this in the context of 3D nanophotonic lenses, used for focusing light between plane-waves and single-point, single-wavelength sources such as quantum emitters. We demonstrate that this combined approach allows higher performance than adjoint optimization alone when additional design constraints are applied; can generate large datasets (which further allows faster iterative training to be performed); and can utilize transfer learning to be retrained on new design parameters with very few new training samples. This process can be used for general nanophotonic design, and is particularly beneficial when a range of design parameters and constraints would need to be applied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".