Digital Twin Enabled Asset Management of Machine Tools
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine tools (MT) are essential equipment in modern manufacturing. They are a large investment which yields great returns to productivity and profitability. MTs enable the high throughput manufacturing of high precision components. Given their great importance, and their large cost, it is beneficial to implement asset management (AM) strategies such as condition monitoring, fault detection and predictive maintenance. Implementing these processes and methods can improve reliability and performance of MTs, while extending their lifetime and reducing operating expenses. Digital twins (DT) are an emerging technology within the Industry 4.0 landscape. They represent a connection between a physical system, object, or process and it’s virtual representation. DTs can be leveraged for AM implementation in MTs. This work examines the potential benefits of applying DTs to AM, examples in the literature of applying AM methods to MTs using DT, and how advanced AM strategies can be deployed using DT. From examining the literature it was clear that DTs are well suited for AM in MTs. DTs enable improved data collection and processing, modeling and model retention, and historical analysis and trend prediction. DTs have been applied to a variety of application scenarios for MTs such as in cutting tools, spindles, and feed drives. DTs can additionally enable more advanced modeling solutions such as physics informed machine learning which can overcome some issues with traditional data-driven and physics-based modeling strategies. These advanced methods can improve overall AM across the MT’s life-cycle and enable effective prognostic health management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".