MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401554569 · doi:10.1177/17506980241270873

Conjuring the ‘ship of dreams’: Spatial narratives and making the absent present around and within Titanic Belfast

2024· article· en· W4401554569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMemory Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeWonderHistoryNorthern irelandFeelingVisual artsTragedy (event)Identity (music)AestheticsArtLiteraturePsychologyEthnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Powerful prosthetic memories of the Titanic story have circulated in popular culture for more than a century and have become the focus of several experiential museums and Titanic-focused heritage sites on both sides of the Atlantic, most notably in Belfast, Northern Ireland, where the doomed liner was built. Drawing on recent field work, this article analyses the ways in which a series of engaging, multisensory and three-dimensional spatial narratives have been deployed within the new Titanic Belfast signature attraction and the surrounding memoryscape to make the absent ship present for visitors once more. These spatial narratives inform an affective heritage approach that focuses, not on the tragedy of Titanic’s sinking, but on feelings of awe and wonder at the scale and grandeur of the great ship, allowing memory managers to tell a celebratory, Belfast-focused origin story for this internationally renowned ‘ship of dreams’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it