MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401567521 · doi:10.1109/lnet.2024.3444495

Channel Aging-Aware LSTM-Based Channel Prediction for Satellite Communications

2024· article· en· W4401567521 on OpenAlexaff
Omid Abbasi, Georges Kaddoum

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Networking Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceCommunications satelliteSatelliteTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satellite communication systems encounter channel aging issues due to the substantial distance that separates users and satellites. In such systems, the estimated channel state at a given time slot reflects the channel state from several time slots in the past. This letter proposes a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based architecture for channel prediction to mitigate the channel aging problem. The proposed scheme predicts the next time slot’s channel based on a block of estimated channel state information (CSI) from previous time slots. We consider the effect of channel aging in the training phase so that channel prediction in the testing phase is performed based on available data. We demonstrated through simulation experiments on new radio non-terrestrial network tapped delay line (NR NTN TDL) channel models, that our proposed scheme can effectively mitigate channel aging, and that it performs better than outdated channels. The proposed scheme improves the reliability and efficiency of satellite communication systems with long propagation delays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Networking LettersSame topicTelecommunications and Broadcasting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207