MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401567521 · doi:10.1109/lnet.2024.3444495

Channel Aging-Aware LSTM-Based Channel Prediction for Satellite Communications

2024· article· en· W4401567521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Networking Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceCommunications satelliteSatelliteTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satellite communication systems encounter channel aging issues due to the substantial distance that separates users and satellites. In such systems, the estimated channel state at a given time slot reflects the channel state from several time slots in the past. This letter proposes a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based architecture for channel prediction to mitigate the channel aging problem. The proposed scheme predicts the next time slot’s channel based on a block of estimated channel state information (CSI) from previous time slots. We consider the effect of channel aging in the training phase so that channel prediction in the testing phase is performed based on available data. We demonstrated through simulation experiments on new radio non-terrestrial network tapped delay line (NR NTN TDL) channel models, that our proposed scheme can effectively mitigate channel aging, and that it performs better than outdated channels. The proposed scheme improves the reliability and efficiency of satellite communication systems with long propagation delays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it