MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401683986 · doi:10.1021/acsestengg.4c00315

Surface Complexation and Packed Bed Mass Transport Models Enable Adsorbent Design for Arsenate and Vanadate Removal

2024· article· en· W4401683986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS ES&T Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Engineering Education and CentersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Science FoundationIra A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State UniversityUniversity of TorontoArizona State University
KeywordsArsenateAdsorptionChemistryMass transferFreundlich equationChemical engineeringChromatographyArsenicOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Co-occurrence of metal oxo-anions (e.g., arsenate) in drinking water poses human health risks. To understand and predict competition and breakthrough for individual or mixtures of oxo-anions in continuous-flow packed bed adsorption systems, we linked equilibrium surface complexation models (SCMs) with a pore surface diffusion model (PSDM). After parametrization, using data for two commercial adsorbents, the SCM and PSDM predicted well the adsorption isotherm data and column breakthrough curves, respectively, for single-solute (arsenate) and bisolute water chemistries (arsenate, vanadate) as well as chromatographic displacement of previously adsorbed arsenate by vanadate. Surface and pore diffusivities for both commercial adsorbents were 3.0 to 3.5 x10 –12 cm 2 /s and 1.1 to 0.8 x10 –6 cm 2 /s, respectively. After validation, SCM + PSDM was used in silico to evaluate adsorbent media characteristics, variable water chemistries, and reactor configurations. When contrasting hypothetical crystalline versus amorphous metal (hydr)oxide adsorbents, increasing surface site density resulted in higher Freundlich isotherm capacity ( K F ) but did not impact 1/ n . Increasing surface binding affinities beneficially impacted both the K F and 1/ n isotherms and would improve the performance of point-of-use (POU) adsorbent system applications. In silico simulation results suggest prioritizing enhancing adsorbent capacity ( q ) through improved surface reactivity in the design of new POU adsorbent materials rather than focusing on reducing mass transport limitations through intraparticle pore design. For municipal-scale adsorption systems, the PSDM simulation of the mass transfer zone shape was evaluated for hypothetical adsorbent pore designs (i.e., intraparticle porosity (ε p ) and tortuosity) and demonstrated that ε p control was a key strategy to improve performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it