MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401701619 · doi:10.1063/5.0215273

Iodinated gadolinium-gold nanomaterial as a multimodal contrast agent for cartilage tissue imaging

2024· article· en· W4401701619 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAPL Bioengineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsTerry Fox Research Institute
FundersKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNational Cheng Kung UniversityInstitute of Nuclear Energy ResearchNational Health Research InstitutesChang Gung Medical FoundationSun Yat-sen UniversityNational Science and Technology CouncilAcademia SinicaChang Gung Memorial HospitalNational Sun Yat-sen University
KeywordsGadoliniumContrast (vision)CartilageNanomaterialsIodinated contrastBiomedical engineeringMedicineMaterials scienceRadiologyNanotechnologyComputer scienceAnatomyArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cartilage damage, a common cause of osteoarthritis, requires medical imaging for accurate diagnosis of pathological changes. However, current instruments can acquire limited imaging information due to sensitivity and resolution issues. Therefore, multimodal imaging is considered an alternative strategy to provide valuable images and analyzes from different perspectives. Among all biomaterials, gold nanomaterials not only exhibit outstanding benefits as drug carriers, in vitro diagnostics, and radiosensitizers, but are also widely used as contrast agents, particularly for tumors. However, their potential for imaging cartilage damage is rarely discussed. In this study, we developed a versatile iodinated gadolinium-gold nanomaterial, AuNC@BSA-Gd-I, and its radiolabeled derivative, AuNC@BSA-Gd-131I, for cartilage detection. With its small size, negative charge, and multimodal capacities, the probe can penetrate damaged cartilage and be detected or visualized by computed tomography, MRI, IVIS, and gamma counter. Additionally, the multimodal imaging potential of AuNC@BSA-Gd-I was compared to current multifunctional gold nanomaterials containing similar components, including anionic AuNC@BSA, AuNC@BSA-I, and AuNC@BSA-Gd as well as cationic AuNC@CBSA. Due to their high atomic numbers and fluorescent emission, AuNC@BSA nanomaterials could provide fundamental multifunctionality for imaging. By further modifying AuNC@BSA with additional imaging materials, their application could be extended to various types of medical imaging instruments. Nonetheless, our findings showed that each of the current nanomaterials exhibited excellent abilities for imaging cartilage with their predominant imaging modalities, but their versatility was not comparable to that of AuNC@BSA-Gd-I. Thus, AuNC@BSA-Gd-I could be served as a valuable tool in multimodal imaging strategies for cartilage assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it