Spectral Graph Learning With Core Eigenvectors Prior via Iterative GLASSO and Projection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Before the execution of many standard graph signal processing (GSP) modules, such as compression and restoration, learning of a graph that encodes pairwise (dis)similarities in data is an important precursor. In data-starved scenarios, to reduce parameterization, previous graph learning algorithms make assumptions in the nodal domain on i) graph connectivity (e.g., edge sparsity), and/or ii) edge weights (e.g., positive edges only). In this paper, given an empirical covariance matrix <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\bar{{\mathbf{C}}}$</tex-math></inline-formula> estimated from sparse data, we consider instead a spectral-domain assumption on the graph Laplacian matrix <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathcal{L}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>: the first <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$</tex-math></inline-formula> eigenvectors (called “core” eigenvectors) <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\{{\mathbf{u}}_{k}\}$</tex-math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathcal{L}}$</tex-math></inline-formula> are pre-selected—e.g., based on domain-specific knowledge—and only the remaining eigenvectors are learned and parameterized. We first prove that, inside a Hilbert space of real symmetric matrices, the subspace <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathcal{H}}_{\mathbf{u}}^{+}$</tex-math></inline-formula> of positive semi-definite (PSD) matrices sharing a common set of core <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$</tex-math></inline-formula> eigenvectors <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\{{\mathbf{u}}_{k}\}$</tex-math></inline-formula> is a convex cone. Inspired by the Gram-Schmidt procedure, we then construct an efficient operator to project a given positive definite (PD) matrix onto <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathcal{H}}_{\mathbf{u}}^{+}$</tex-math></inline-formula>. Finally, we design a hybrid graphical lasso/projection algorithm to compute a locally optimal inverse Laplacian <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathcal{L}}^{-1}\in{\mathcal{H}}_{\mathbf{u}}^{+}$</tex-math></inline-formula> given <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\bar{{\mathbf{C}}}$</tex-math></inline-formula>. We apply our graph learning algorithm in two practical settings: parliamentary voting interpolation and predictive transform coding in image compression. Experiments show that our algorithm outperformed existing graph learning schemes in data-starved scenarios for both synthetic data and these two settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it