MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401762494 · doi:10.5430/jct.v13n4p258

The Influence of Flipped Learning on Geographic Concept Acquisition among Al-Balqa' Applied University Undergraduate Students in the Environment and Society Course

2024· article· en· W4401762494 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eman Nayef Al Njadat

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlipped classroomFlipped learningMathematics educationClass (philosophy)PsychologyControl (management)Computer scienceMedical educationArtificial intelligenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to determine the influence of flipped classroom techniques on the acquisition of geographical concepts within an undergraduate Environment and Society course. Using an experimental design, 50 students at Al-Balqa Applied University were randomly divided into a flipped learning intervention group and a traditional learning control group. Quantitative pre- and post-achievement tests and a questionnaire gauged changes in academic performance and perceptions. The flipped approach incorporated pre-class educational videos, homework tasks, and active in-class learning. Analyses revealed the experimental group attained statistically significantly higher post-test scores versus the control, with a large effect size demonstrating 41.9% of the variance in achievement explained by flipped methods. Triangulation from the questionnaire further showed strong agreement that flipped learning enhanced motivation and self-directed education. While supporting earlier research that flipping classrooms has positive effects across all subjects, this study adds to our knowledge of how effective it is in helping Jordanian undergraduates master human geographical concepts. Recommendations include broader implementation of flipped techniques aligned to course objectives, faculty training in instructional technologies, enhanced university digital infrastructure, and additional research tracking long-term knowledge retention. Overall, carefully gathered data showed significant gains in both the quantity and quality of learning, supporting ideas about the benefits of incorporating flipped learning into higher education with care. According to the main findings, the critical recommendation is to implement flipped learning in the Environment and Society course at Al-Balqa Applied University, involving a task force to design a tailored framework incorporating pre-recorded lectures and online materials via the LMS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and TeachingSame topicInnovative Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207