MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401990371 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2024.3435065

Estimating Resonances in Low-SNR Late-Time Radar Returns With Sampling Jitter

2024· article· en· W4401990371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJitterComputer scienceRadarSampling (signal processing)AlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequency and attenuation rate of a resonance in the late-time return of a radar signal are indicative of a target's geometry and conductivity, and hence they can be used as features in a variety of filtering and classification applications. However, late-time returns are typically observed over short windows at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs, averaged over the window), and often in the presence of sampling jitter. This can make the estimation of these parameters difficult, even when multiple measurement shots are available. In this article, we develop a new multi-shot estimation method that is based on models for the distribution of the roots of the z-transform of the received signal. Under an additive-Gaussian-noise model, we have a closed-form expression for the root distribution in terms of the resonance parameters, and the parameters are estimated by matching the model distribution to the empirical distribution. The root distribution has a strong dependence on the frequency and attenuation rate, and leads to significantly better estimates than existing techniques at low SNRs. By developing approximate models, we extend these performance advantages to scenarios with significant sampling jitter and synchronization offsets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it