Integrated two-stage multi-factory assembly scheduling with maintenance considerations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the dynamic landscape of contemporary industry, integrating maintenance practices with production scheduling is essential for sustaining operational efficiency and competitiveness. This study addresses a two-stage multi-factory assembly scheduling problem, introducing an innovative approach that incorporates maintenance practices to enhance system reliability in the face of unexpected machine failures. For deterministic scheduling, a tailored mixed-integer programming model is presented to minimise the makespan. This model is extended to formulate a stochastic schedule, accommodating unforeseen machine breakdowns through stochastic distributions. The extension includes the integration of preventive and corrective maintenance activities into an integrated two-stage multi-factory assembly scheduling problem. To solve the resulting optimisation problem, a decomposition algorithm utilising an exact solver is proposed. This approach breaks down the main model into smaller models, addressing computational challenges. Comparative analyses against the widely adopted CPLEX software across various instances validate the effectiveness of our approach. A significant finding from this comparison is that our decomposition algorithm outperforms the exact solver, achieving the optimal solution at a faster rate. In sensitivity analyses, the results underscore the superior solution-finding capability of our integrated stochastic model compared to maintenance heuristics from existing literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it