Minimum profile Hellinger distance estimation of general covariate models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Covariate models, such as polynomial regression models, generalized linear models, and heteroscedastic models, are widely used in statistical applications. The importance of such models in statistical analysis is abundantly clear by the ever-increasing rate at which articles on covariate models are appearing in the statistical literature. Because of their flexibility, covariate models are increasingly being exploited as a convenient way to model data that consist of both a response variable and one or more covariate variables that affect the outcome of the response variable. Efficient and robust estimates for broadly defined semiparametric covariate models are investigated, and for this purpose the minimum distance approach is employed. In general, minimum distance estimators are automatically robust with respect to the stability of the quantity being estimated. In particular, minimum Hellinger distance estimation for parametric models produces estimators that are asymptotically efficient at the model density and simultaneously possess excellent robustness properties. For semiparametric covariate models, the minimum Hellinger distance method is extended and a minimum profile Hellinger distance estimator is proposed. Its asymptotic properties such as consistency are studied, and its finite-sample performance and robustness are examined by using Monte Carlo simulations and three real data analyses. Additionally, a computing algorithm is developed to ease the computation of the estimator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".