MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

129 Effectiveness of automated speed enforcement in reducing vehicle speeds within school community safety zones in Toronto, Canada

2024· article· en· W4402058840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueYork UniversityUniversity of TorontoToronto Metropolitan UniversitySickKids Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnforcementTransport engineeringVehicle safetyLaw enforcementComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Speed is one of the most important determinants of traffic collisions and the severity of resulting injuries. While previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) on major roads in reducing speed violations and related incidents, research exploring its impact on residential and community areas is limited. In 2020, the City of Toronto introduced an ASE program with 50 mobile camera units, which were relocated to new school areas at the end of each phase. This study analyzes data collected from 250 locations during the initial five phases of the ASE program. <h3>Objective</h3> This study aims to evaluate the impact of ASE cameras on reducing vehicle speeds near schools in Toronto. <h3>Methods</h3> Pre-ASE installation data, encompassing speed and vehicle volume metrics collected post-2018 using pneumatic road tubes, were compared with data obtained during the ASE deployment. Our analysis examined the proportion of vehicles exceeding speed limits and changes in the 85th percentile speeds. Fixed-effects regressions with robust standard errors using generalized estimating equation (GEE) was employed to estimate mean differences in 85th percentile speeds over time, accounting for program phases, seasonality, and the built environment. The relative risk (RR) of vehicles exceeding speed limits during the ASE intervention, adjusting for confounding factors was also determined. <h3>Results</h3> Our findings reveal a large reduction in the 85th percentile speed by 11 km/h and a 46% decrease in the risk of vehicles exceeding speed limits during the ASE intervention. This reduction was particularly notable on roads with higher speed limits. Some locations in inner suburban Toronto near schools continued to experience high-speed traffic even with the cameras, which poses potential risks to vulnerable road users. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The Toronto ASE program has effectively reduced speeding. In some areas, speeding above 30 km/h (WHO recommended speed for busy mixed-traffic urban areas) was prevalent even with the ASE intervention period due to set speed limits and connectivity to high-volume arterial roads and highways. Our results emphasize the potential of ASE as an important component of Toronto’s Vision Zero initiatives, alongside other speed management strategies, in enhancing safety near schools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it