MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402093955 · doi:10.1016/j.srs.2024.100160

Characterizing forest structural changes in response to non-stand replacing disturbances using bitemporal airborne laser scanning data

2024· article· en· W4402093955 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tommaso Trotto, Nicholas C. Coops, Alexis Achim, Sarah E. Gergel, Dominik Röeser

Bibliographic record

VenueScience of Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaser scanningRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceLaserGeologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characterizing the extent, severity, and persistence of natural disturbances in forests is crucial in areas as large and heterogeneous as the Canadian boreal forest. Non-stand replacing (NSR) disturbances, in particular, can produce subtle and lagged impacts to forest canopy and structure with mechanisms that remain elusive, and they are challenging to discern using typical remote sensing approaches including aerial photointerpretation and spectral analysis of satellite imagery. Consequently, there is a need for timely and accurate information on the structural modifications due to NSR disturbances to inform proactive forest management practices. To address these needs, we leveraged a unique bitemporal airborne laser scanning (ALS) dataset to characterize changes in the forest structure caused by eastern spruce budworm (ESB, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.)), responsible for one of the greatest tree mortality in Canada. A range of infestation severity with varying impacts to forest structure are examined in a mixedwood boreal forest in Lac-Saint Jean, Quebec, Canada. We derived 14 ALS structural change metrics at 10 m spatial resolution, including height, cover, and gappiness 7 years apart (2014–2020). Six distinct structural responses to cumulative ESB infestations severity were identified using cluster analysis from the combination of the 14 change metrics, with canopy cover, the 75th and 25th height percentiles (p75-25) driving cluster separability. Canopy cover and p25 consistently decreased as cumulative infestation severity increased, whereas p75 showed greater variability across the landscape. Photointerpretation of aerial imagery over the same period confirmed the validity of the structural characterization. Further, we studied the role of initial forest structures in modulating the severity of the infestation and found that sparser canopies with cover <65% and shorter trees (p75 < 7.5 m, p25 < 2.5 m) were associated with less severe ESB infestations after 7 years, and controlling for underlying environmental factors. These findings showed the potential of bitemporal ALS data in characterizing structural changes due to ESB infestations at fine scale based on canopy cover and height, relevant for forest management strategies to better target current and future infestations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience of Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207