Day-Ahead electricity price forecasting using a CNN-BiLSTM model in conjunction with autoregressive modeling and hyperparameter optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• A hybrid DL model (CNN-BiLSTM-AR) is proposed to forecast the electricity price. • Integrating an AR model in parallel with a CNN-BiLSTM enhances the performance. • The influence of incorporating HPO methods like GA, PSO, and RS is investigated. • Performance difference between the models is verified using a statistical test. • Two distinct European datasets used to validate the proposed model performance. The inherent volatility in electricity prices exerts a significant impact on the dynamic nature of the electricity market, shaping the decision-making processes of its stakeholders. Precise Electricity Price Forecasting (EPF) plays a pivotal role in enabling energy suppliers to optimize their bidding strategies, mitigate transactional risks, and capitalize on market opportunities, thereby ensuring alignment with the true economic value of energy transactions. Hence, this study proposes an advanced deep learning model for forecasting electricity prices one day in ahead. The model leverages the synergistic capabilities of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory networks (BiLSTM), operating concurrently with an autoregressive (AR) component, denoted as CNN-BiLSTM-AR. The integration of the AR model alongside CNN-BiLSTM enhances overall performance by exploiting AR’s proficiency in capturing transient linear dependencies. Simultaneously, CNN-BiLSTM excels in assimilating spatial and protracted temporal features. Moreover, the research delves into the implications of incorporating hyperparameter optimization (HPO) techniques, such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Random Search (RS). The effectiveness of the model is evaluated using two distinct European datasets sourced from the UK and German electricity markets. Performance metrics, including Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), serve as benchmarks for assessment. Finally, the findings underscore the notable performance enhancement achieved through the implementation of HPO methods in conjunction with the proposed model. Especially, the PSO-CNN-BiLSTM-AR model demonstrates substantial reductions in RMSE and MAE, amounting to 16.7% and 23.46%, respectively, for the German electricity market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".