A human-in-the-loop ensemble fusion framework for road crash prediction: coping with imbalanced heterogeneous data from the driver-vehicle-environment system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Road accidents are an inevitable aspect of daily life, and predicting crashes is crucial for minimizing disruptions and advancing intelligent transportation technologies. This study aims to design an ensemble fusion decision system using various base classifiers and a meta-classifier to improve crash prediction efficiency within the driver-vehicle-environment system. We adopted a data-driven strategy to analyze four categories of features—driver demographics, vehicle telemetry, driver inputs, and environmental conditions—collected from a driving simulator. Optimized modeling strategies using AdaBoost, XGBoost, GBM, LightGBM, and CatBoost were implemented. Moreover, statistical logit models were also used to assess the likelihood of crashes and the correlations among key variables. Furthermore, three resampling strategies, SMOTE-TL, SMOTE-ENN, and ADASYN, were employed to address class imbalance. The best performance was achieved with GBM, XGBoost, and AdaBoost as base classifiers, SMOTE-TL for balancing, and CatBoost as the meta-classifier, with 89.78% precision, 95.69% recall, and 92.64% F1-score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".