CODE+: Fast and Accurate Inference for Compact Distributed IoT Data Collection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In distributed IoT data systems, full-size data collection is impractical due to the energy constraints and large system scales. Our previous work has investigated the advantages of integrating matrix sampling and inference for compact distributed IoT data collection, to minimize the data collection cost while guaranteeing the data benefits. This paper further advances the technology by boosting fast and accurate inference for those distributed IoT data systems that are sensitive to computation time, training stability, and inference accuracy. Particularly, we proposeCODE$^{+}$+, i.e.,Compact Distributed IOTData CollEction Plus, which features a cluster-based sampling module and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-Transformer Autoencoders-based inference module, to reduce cost and guarantee the data benefits. The sampling component employs a cluster-based matrix sampling approach, in which data clustering is first conducted and then a two-step sampling is performed in accordance with the number of clusters and clustering errors. The inference component integrates a CNN-Transformer Autoencoders-based matrix inference model to estimate the full-size spatio-temporal data matrix, which consists of a CNN-Transformer encoder that extracts the underlying features from the sampled data matrix and a lightweight decoder that maps the learned latent features back to the original full-size data matrix. We implementCODE$^{+}$+under three operational large-scale IoT systems and one synthetic Gaussian distribution dataset, and extensive experiments are provided to demonstrate its efficiency and robustness. With a 20% sampling ratio,CODE$^{+}$+achieves an average data reconstruction accuracy of 94% across four datasets, outperforming our previous version of 87% and state-of-the-art baseline of 71%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".