MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Twin-Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Approach for UAV Formation Control

2024· article· en· W4402262704 on OpenAlexafffund
Yintao Zhang, Youmin Zhang, Ziquan Yu, Jin Li, Qiaomeng Qin, Chenxi Gao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersChangjiang Scholar Program of Chinese Ministry of EducationAeronautical Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceControl (management)Control theory (sociology)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the use of a Twin-Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) approach for the formation control of multiple Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (multi-UAVs). A leader-follower configuration is adopted. The proposed TD3 algorithm integrates the Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) algorithm with the double$Q-\mathbf{learning}$technique, creating a continuous controller for the formation tracking of multi-UAVs. Unlike the DDPG, TD3 utilizes two$Q-\mathbf{networks}$that explore the environment independently, selecting the smaller$Q-\mathbf{values}$to compute targets and update the$Q-\mathbf{functions}$. Additionally, the target action policy is constrained within a valid action range, and updates are deliberately delayed to prevent the exploitation of erroneous experiences. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207