MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prediksi Disleksia pada Anak menggunakan Metode Naive Bayes

2024· article· en· W4402318875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Umum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaive Bayes classifierPsychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dyslexia is a neurological disorder that affects a person's ability to read, spell, and understand words with a level of difficulty that is not in accordance with their level of intelligence or education. It is a lifelong condition that can affect the way the brain processes information related to reading and written language skills. This study uses the Naïve Bayes method. is a method that uses probability and statistical calculations. And the advantage of the Naïve Bayes classification is that this method only requires a small amount of training data to determine the parameter estimates needed in the classification process. The purpose of this study is to find out how to solve the diagnosis or problems arising from dyslexia in children made in an expert system using the Naïve Bayes method and to find out the results of making the system can replace an expert into a computer so that the diagnosis is easier and faster. The results of this study are by selecting the symptoms that occur in children according to what is experienced, the system can find out the child or patient can be diagnosed quickly according to consultation with a dyslexia expert.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it