MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402320716 · doi:10.5376/jmr.2024.14.0010

Mosquito Species Identification and Phylogenetics: A Global Perspective

2024· article· en· W4402320716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mosquito Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogeneticsIdentification (biology)Perspective (graphical)BiologyEvolutionary biologyZoologyEcologyGeographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mosquitoes are vectors of numerous diseases, making their accurate identification and understanding of their phylogenetic relationships crucial for public health. This study synthesizes global research on mosquito species identification and phylogenetics, highlighting various methodologies and findings. Studies have utilized mitochondrial genomes, ribosomal RNA sequences, and wing geometric morphometrics to elucidate the evolutionary history and diversification of mosquito species. Phylogenetic analyses have revealed significant insights into the monophyly of subfamilies and tribes, the impact of geographic isolation, and the role of insect-specific viruses in modulating arbovirus transmission. This study underscores the importance of integrating morphological, molecular, and genetic approaches to enhance mosquito surveillance and control strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it