MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402365971 · doi:10.1093/imanum/drae053

A mini immersed finite element method for two-phase Stokes problems on Cartesian meshes

2024· article· en· W4402365971 on OpenAlexaff
Haifeng Ji, Dong Liang, Qian Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Numerical Analysis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPolygon meshMathematicsFinite element methodStokes problemCartesian coordinate systemVolume meshMathematical analysisGeometryMesh generationStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a mini immersed finite element (IFE) method for solving two- and three-dimensional two-phase Stokes problems on Cartesian meshes. The IFE space is constructed from the conventional mini element, with shape functions modified on interface elements according to interface jump conditions while keeping the degrees of freedom unchanged. Both discontinuous viscosity coefficients and surface forces are taken into account in the construction. The interface is approximated using discrete level set functions, and explicit formulas for IFE basis functions and correction functions are derived, facilitating ease of implementation.The inf-sup stability and the optimal a priori error estimate of the IFE method, along with the optimal approximation capabilities of the IFE space, are derived rigorously, with constants that are independent of the mesh size and the manner in which the interface intersects the mesh, but may depend on the discontinuous viscosity coefficients. Additionally, it is proved that the condition number has the usual bound independent of the interface. Numerical experiments are provided to confirm the theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIMA Journal of Numerical AnalysisSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207