MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402438569 · doi:10.11159/mmme24.127

An Application of Geographic Information System for Quarries Management

2024· article· en· W4402438569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Applications and Data Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographic information systemComputer scienceGeographyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have evolved considerably, offering a wide range of applications.The flexibility of open-source software allows users to develop customized tools to address specific challenges in various fields [1].The availability of construction materials is essential for infrastructure development in any modern society [2].Therefore, quarries represent a field of study where the effectiveness of GIS can significantly optimize operations.In the mining sector, available programs and tools are often complex, especially when dealing with 3D models or advanced algorithms.Additionally, quarry operations require more accessible and agile solutions that enable users to efficiently handle spatial data and obtain real-time results for operational decision-making [3].Furthermore, effective quarry management is essential for mitigating environmental impacts and maximizing short and long-term sustainability.Our approach focuses on implementing a block model in a GIS, which integrates relevant information for quarry management and can be used in short-, medium-, and long-term mine planning [4].This will provide users with quick access to data related to production, product quality, consumption, and socio-environmental impacts, as well as the quality of the rock being excavated.The results will facilitate visualization through tables, graphs, and maps of the current or future state, excavation progress, or possible mining strategies.GIS can contribute to quarry management through results that provide a clear view of operation evolution and allow the identification of areas for improvement and optimization opportunities, in addition to a reduction in impacts such as emissions of gases into the atmosphere from loading or transportation stages [5], [6].The ability to access accurate data on consumption and emissions quickly and efficiently provides users with the opportunity to make well-versed decisions that drive operational efficiency improvement and promote the use of practices aligned with the concept of green mining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it