Transient NOx emission modeling of a hydrogen-diesel engine using hybrid machine learning methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One promising approach to reduce carbon foot print of internal combustion engines (ICEs) is using alternative fuels like hydrogen, particularly by converting medium and heavy-duty diesel engines to dual-fuel hydrogen-diesel engines. To minimize elevated NOx emissions from hydrogen-fueled engine, fast and accurate emission models are essential for engine model-based control and for engine calibration and optimization using hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) setups. In this study, a fast-response NOx emissions sensor is used to measure the transient NOx emissions from a dual-fuel hydrogen-diesel engine. Subsequently, steady-state models (SSMs), quasi steady-state models (QSSMs), and transient sequential models (TSMs) in the form of black-box (BB) and gray-box (GB) models are developed for transient NOx emissions prediction. GB models utilize both information from a one dimensional (1D) physical engine model and experimental data for training, while BB models only use experimental data. SSMs are optimized artificial neural networks (ANNs) trained using steady-state data, QSSMs are optimized ANNs trained using transient data, and TSMs are time-series networks trained using transient data. Long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks are used as the time-series deep learning networks. The results showed that the 1D physical model has the poorest performance with successive model performance improvement from SSM to QSSM and from QSSM to TSM. The developed BB TSM model in this study can predict transient NOx emissions with an R 2 value greater than 0.96 at 89,000 predictions per second which makes this model suitable for real-time engine model-based control where computational efficiency is crucial. The developed GB TSM model can predict transient NOx emissions with an R 2 value greater than 0.97 but it is computationally more expensive. The extra accuracy of the GB TSM models makes them the best choice for HIL setups where more computational power is available, and accuracy is more crucial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".