Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Systematic Literature Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is caused by multiple clinical conditions such as cystic fibrosis and chronic pancreatitis (CP). Standard management of EPI includes pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) along with consultation with a dietitian. While PERTs have been on the market for several decades, newer publications on their clinical efficacy and safety raised the need for a comprehensive review of the literature. We aimed to identify the available evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of treatments for EPI to understand the current treatment landscape and unmet need in patients with EPI. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in Embase, Medline, and Evidence-Based Medicine databases from 2010 to 2022; conference proceedings from 2020 to 2022 were also searched. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers at abstract and full-text stage against predefined eligibility criteria. RESULTS: We identified 26 journal publications and two conference abstracts, reporting on 22 randomized control trials, four observational studies, and two single-arm interventional studies. The most reported treatment was pancrelipase, specifically Creon® (n = 12). Fourteen studies reported coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) results. Across studies, patients experienced a considerable increase in CFA post-initiation of treatment regardless of intervention or timepoint. Mean change in CFA ranged from 7.5% in patients with CP who received placebo to 36% in patients with CP treated with Creon®. Ten studies reported coefficient of nitrogen absorption (CNA). Where reported, pancrelipase (including Creon®) increased CNA levels in EPI patients compared to placebo. Only one study compared PERT brands head-to-head: no significant differences were reported in the CNA-72 h values (Creon® 82.0% [SE: 1.2] vs. Zenpep® 80.9% [SE: 1.2]). Loss of body weight and low body mass index (BMI) are important features of EPI. Overall, treatment with PERT increased BMI and body weight, or limited their decline, with increases ranging from 0.1 to 6.1 kg. Based on the 18 studies that reported safety outcomes, PERT was considered safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This SLR confirmed that PERT is an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with EPI. However, nutritional parameters and health-related quality of life data were sparsely reported, and future clinical trials should look to incorporate these data given their importance in clinical practice and patient outcomes. INTRODUCTION: Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is caused by multiple clinical conditions such as cystic fibrosis and chronic pancreatitis (CP). Standard management of EPI includes pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) along with consultation with a dietitian. While PERTs have been on the market for several decades, newer publications on their clinical efficacy and safety raised the need for a comprehensive review of the literature. We aimed to identify the available evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of treatments for EPI to understand the current treatment landscape and unmet need in patients with EPI. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in Embase, Medline, and Evidence-Based Medicine databases from 2010 to 2022; conference proceedings from 2020 to 2022 were also searched. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers at abstract and full-text stage against predefined eligibility criteria. RESULTS: We identified 26 journal publications and two conference abstracts, reporting on 22 randomized control trials, four observational studies, and two single-arm interventional studies. The most reported treatment was pancrelipase, specifically Creon® (n = 12). Fourteen studies reported coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) results. Across studies, patients experienced a considerable increase in CFA post-initiation of treatment regardless of intervention or timepoint. Mean change in CFA ranged from 7.5% in patients with CP who received placebo to 36% in patients with CP treated with Creon®. Ten studies reported coefficient of nitrogen absorption (CNA). Where reported, pancrelipase (including Creon®) increased CNA levels in EPI patients compared to placebo. Only one study compared PERT brands head-to-head: no significant differences were reported in the CNA-72 h values (Creon® 82.0% [SE: 1.2] vs. Zenpep® 80.9% [SE: 1.2]). Loss of body weight and low body mass index (BMI) are important features of EPI. Overall, treatment with PERT increased BMI and body weight, or limited their decline, with increases ranging from 0.1 to 6.1 kg. Based on the 18 studies that reported safety outcomes, PERT was considered safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This SLR confirmed that PERT is an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with EPI. However, nutritional parameters and health-related quality of life data were sparsely reported, and future clinical trials should look to incorporate these data given their importance in clinical practice and patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it