MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402645746 · doi:10.4171/jca/101

On the interaction of the Coxeter transformation and the rowmotion bijection

2024· article· en· W4402645746 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Algebra · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilBanff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and DiscoveryJohns Hopkins UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsBijectionCoxeter groupTransformation (genetics)MathematicsCombinatoricsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let P be a finite poset and L the associated distributive lattice of order ideals of P . Let \rho denote the rowmotion bijection of the order ideals of P viewed as a permutation matrix and C the Coxeter matrix for the incidence algebra kL of L . Then, we show the identity (\rho^{-1}C)^{2}=\mathrm{id} , as was originally conjectured by Sam Hopkins. Recently, it was noted that the rowmotion bijection is a special case of the much more general grade bijection R that exists for any Auslander regular algebra. This motivates to study the interaction of the grade bijection and the Coxeter matrix for general Auslander regular algebras. For the class of higher Auslander algebras coming from n -representation finite algebras, we show that (R^{-1}C)^{2}=\mathrm{id} if n is even and (R^{-1}C+\mathrm{id})^{2}=0 when n is odd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it