Optimized Pattern Partitioning for Multi-Pass Printing: PARAOMASKING
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In halftone-driven imaging pipelines focus is often placed on halftone pattern design as the main contributor to overall output quality. However, for sequential or cumulative imaging technologies, such as multi-pass printing, an important element is also pattern partitioning - how the overall halftone pattern is divided among the different partial imaging events such as printing passes. Partitioning is usually designed agnostically of the halftone pattern, making it impossible to optimize for the joint effect of halftone and partitioning. However, even a good halftone pattern coupled with a good partitioning scheme does not guarantee well partitioned halftones and can impact image quality attributes. In this paper a novel approach called PARAOMASKING is presented that benefits from the pattern-determinism of PARAWACS halftoning and proposes a partitioning scheme for multi-pass printing such that optimality is also obtained for partitioned halftones. Results - both digital and printed - show how it can lead to significant improvements in partial pattern quality and overall pattern quality. Consequently, output attributes such as grain, coalescence and pattern robustness are improved. The focus here is on blue-noise pattern preservation but the approach can also be extended to other objectives, e.g., maximizing per-pass clustering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it