MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402765523 · doi:10.3390/a17100425

Detecting Fake Accounts on Instagram Using Machine Learning and Hybrid Optimization Algorithms

2024· article· en· W4402765523 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgorithms · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmOptimization algorithmMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a hybrid method for detecting fake accounts on Instagram by using the Binary Grey Wolf Optimization (BGWO) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithms. By combining these two algorithms, we aim to leverage their complementary strengths and enhance the overall optimization performance. We evaluate the proposed hybrid method using four classifiers: Artificial Neural Network (ANN), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression (LR). The dataset for the experiments contains 65,329 Instagram accounts. We extract features from each account, including profile information, posting behavior, and engagement metrics. The Binary Grey Wolf and Particle Swarm Optimizations, when combined to form a hybrid method (BGWOPSO), improved the performance in accurately detecting fake accounts on Instagram.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it