MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402821629 · doi:10.1145/3696113

Agriculture-informed Neural Networks for Predicting Nitrous Oxide Emissions

2024· article· en· W4402821629 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ci Lin, Futong Li, Patrick Killeen, Tet Yeap, Iluju Kiringa

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Internet of Things · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrous oxideAgricultureArtificial neural networkEnvironmental scienceBusinessComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, in its unwavering commitment to sustainable agriculture, has launched a program to reduce nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from fertilizer utilization in farming practices. This initiative is a response to the pressing environmental and climate challenges we face. To achieve our goal, we must delve into the mechanism of N 2 O emission by measuring and predicting the flux of N 2 O. This study proposes a novel architecture for neural network models, namely the agriculture-informed neural network (AINN) model, consisting of recurrent neural networks and a process-based ecosystem model, the Dynamic Land Ecosystem Model (DLEM), to predict N 2 O emissions from farming. During the 2021 and 2022 growing seasons, field data on the flux of N 2 O, soil temperature, and soil moisture were collected. However, the amount of nitrate in the soil was missing since collecting accurate data on nitrate quantities from the soil was challenging. Therefore, assumptions about the nitrate quantity in the soil were made when training and testing AINN with the data collected from the 2021 and 2022 growing seasons. In 2024, from January to April, an indoor experiment under controlled conditions was successfully executed to collect data on nitrate quantity in the soil. This experiment demonstrated that nitrate quantity is an essential factor for predicting the emission of N 2 O. To demonstrate the versatility of the AINN across various neural networks, we conduct a comprehensive comparison with four state-of-the-art models: multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural network, long short-term memory, and Transformer. Our experiment and simulation results unequivocally demonstrate that the performance of AINN is superior to single neural network models. The DLEM component of the AINN acts as a regularizer, facilitating the training process of the AINN. This mathematical formulation transforms the problem of N 2 O emission into a constrained optimization issue, minimizing the explicit objective function and satisfying the constraints of the parameters fed into the DLEM in the AINN. The empirical results show that by incorporating information from the agricultural field, the AINN significantly reduces the generalization error compared to the corresponding neural network, underscoring its potential to revolutionize the field of neural network modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Internet of ThingsSame topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207