MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402830080 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2024.106848

A machine-learning-based column generation heuristic for electric bus scheduling

2024· article· en· W4402830080 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Operations Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColumn generationComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)HeuristicMathematical optimizationOperations researchArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bus scheduling in public transit consists in determining a set of bus schedules to cover a set of timetabled trips at minimum cost. This planning process has evolved recently with the advent of electric buses that introduce constraints related to vehicle autonomy and battery charging process. In particular, column-generation algorithms have regained popularity for solving problems similar to the one considered in this paper, namely, the multi-depot electric vehicle scheduling problem (MDEVSP) with a piecewise linear charging function and capacitated charging stations. To tackle large-scale MDEVSP instances, we design a column generation (CG) heuristic that relies on reduced-sized networks to generate the bus schedules. The reduction is achieved by selecting a priori a subset of the arcs. Multiple selection techniques are studied: some are based on a greedy heuristic and others exploit a supervised learning algorithm relying on a graph neural network. It turns out that combining both selection types yields the best computational results. On 405 artificial instances involving between 568 and 1474 trips and generated from real bus lines in Montreal, the network reduction technique produced an average computational time reduction of 71.6% (compared to the same CG heuristic but without network reduction), while deteriorating solution cost by an average of 2.2%. On 8 larger instances containing more than 2500 trips on average, the proposed solution method also provided an average time saving of 52.5% with an average gap of 4.2% thanks to a transfer learning approach. • Electric bus scheduling with nonlinear recharging function and capacitated stations. • We develop several heuristic arc selection procedures. • The best combines a greedy heuristic and a graph neural network. • It speeds up a column generation heuristic by an average factor of 3.5. • Solution quality deteriorates by 2.2% on average.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it