MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Widely-Linear Processing of Faster-than-Nyquist Signaling in the Presence of IQ Imbalance

2024· article· en· W4402834351 on OpenAlexaff
Fouad Ismael, Ebrahim Bedeer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAdvanced Scientific Research Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignal processingComputer scienceNyquist–Shannon sampling theoremTelecommunicationsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Faster-than-Nyquist (FTN) signaling is a promising approach to increase the spectral efficiency (SE) of next-generation wireless communication systems. In this paper, we investigate the detection of FTN signaling in the presence of in-phase and quadrature (IQ) imbalance in frequency-selective fading channels. We show that IQ imbalance at the transmitter and the receiver of FTN signaling results in an image of the transmit and the received signal, respectively, and this image represents an additional interference. We use concepts from widely linear processing to exploit the correlation between the received signal and its complex conjugate. In particular, we propose a widely-linear minimum mean square error (WL-MMSE) algorithm to estimate the transmit FTN signaling in the presence of IQ imbalance and frequency-selective channels. We additionally prove that the mean square error (MSE) of the proposed WL-MMSE is small than its counterpart of the linear-MMSE (L-MMSE). Simulation results verify our findings in terms of bit error rate (BER) and MSE performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Scientific Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207