Generalized Shortest Path Problem: An Innovative Approach for Non-Additive Problems in Conditional Weighted Graphs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shortest path problem is fundamental in graph theory and has been studied extensively due to its practical importance. Despite this aspect, finding the shortest path between two nodes remains a significant challenge in many applications, as it often becomes complex and time consuming. This complexity becomes even more challenging when constraints make the problem non-additive, thereby increasing the difficulty of finding the optimal path. The objective of this paper is to present a broad perspective on the conventional shortest path problem. It introduces a new method to classify cost functions associated with graphs by defining distinct sets of cost functions. This classification facilitates the exploration of line graphs and an understanding of the upper bounds on the transformation sizes for these types of graphs. Based on these foundations, the paper proposes a practical methodology for solving non-additive shortest path problems. It also provides a proof of optimality and establishes an upper bound on the algorithmic cost of the proposed methodology. This study not only expands the scope of traditional shortest path problems but also highlights their computational complexity and potential solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it