Simultaneous Position-and-Stiffness Control of Underactuated Antagonistic Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Continuum robots have gained widespread popularity due to their inherent compliance and flexibility, particularly their adjustable levels of stiffness for various application scenarios. Despite efforts to dynamic modeling and control synthesis over the past decade, few studies have incorporated stiffness regulation into their feedback control design; however, this is one of the initial motivations to develop continuum robots. This paper addresses the crucial challenge of controlling both the position and stiffness of underactuated continuum robots actuated by antagonistic tendons. We begin by presenting a rigid-link dynamical model that can analyze the open-loop stiffening of tendon-driven continuum robots. Based on this model, we propose a novel passivity-based position-and-stiffness controller that adheres to the non-negative tension constraint. Comprehensive experiments on our continuum robot validate the theoretical results and demonstrate the efficacy and precision of this approach. Note to Practitioners—This paper is motivated by our experience and practical needs in building continuum robotic platforms. Stiffness, flexibility, and accurate configuration regulation are practically important properties for this class of robots. Even though simultaneous position-and-stiffness control is a mature topic for rigid and softly-actuated robots, it remains an open problem for continuum robots with theoretically guaranteed performance. The intention of this paper is to address this situation by proposing a model-based solution for a class of underactuated tendon-driven continuum robots. Hence, we propose an energy-based model and a passivity-based controller to regulate stiffness and configuration concurrently. We believe that this work can be beneficial for academic and industrial research in the context of control algorithms for continuum robots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".