UICE-MIRNet guided image enhancement for underwater object detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Underwater object detection is a crucial aspect of monitoring the aquaculture resources to preserve the marine ecosystem. In most cases, Low-light and scattered lighting conditions create challenges for computer vision-based underwater object detection. To address these issues, low-colorfulness and low-light image enhancement techniques are explored. This work proposes an underwater image enhancement technique called Underwater Image Colorfulness Enhancement MIRNet (UICE-MIRNet) to increase the visibility of small, multiple, dense objects followed by underwater object detection using YOLOv4. UICE-MIRNet is a specialized version of classical MIRNet, which handles random increments of brightness features to address the visibility problem. The proposed UICE-MIRNET restrict brightness and also works on the improvement of the colourfulness of underwater images. UICE-MIRNet consists of an Underwater Image-Colorfulness Enhancement Block (UI-CEB). This block enables the extraction of low-colourful areas from underwater images and performs colour correction without affecting contextual information. The primary characteristics of UICE-MIRNet are the extraction of multiple features using a convolutional stream, feature fusion to facilitate the flow of information, preservation of contextual information by discarding irrelevant features and increasing colourfulness through proper feature selection. Enhanced images are then trained using the YOLOv4 object detection model. The performance of the proposed UICE-MIRNet method is quantitatively evaluated using standard metrics such as UIQM, UCIQE, entropy, and PSNR. The proposed work is compared with many existing image enhancement and restoration techniques. Also, the performance of object detection is assessed using precision, recall, and mAP. Extensive experiments are conducted on two standard datasets, Brackish and Trash-ICRA19, to demonstrate the performance of the proposed work compared to existing methods. The results show that the proposed model outperforms many state-of-the-art techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".