MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403052680 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3468162

Energy Efficient RIS-Assisted UAV Networks Using Twin Delayed DDPG Technique

2024· article· en· W4403052680 on OpenAlexafffund
Bhagawat Adhikari, Ahmed Shaharyar Khwaja, Muhammad Jaseemuddin, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Computer networkStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) has emerged as a promising technology to provide wireless signals from air to the ground users in specific scenarios such as earthquakes, tsunamis and other disasters. The performance of the UAV is degraded when the signals are blocked by obstacles in dense urban scenarios. To address this issue and enhance the signal quality available to the ground users, Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface (RIS) has emerged as a new technological paradigm. It offers an intelligent configuration for the signal propagation environment by redirecting the signals to the users. In this article, we solve a non-convex optimization problem of RIS-assisted UAV network by jointly optimizing the RIS phase shift and 3D trajectory of UAV to maximize the energy efficiency of a rotatory-wing UAV. The considered optimization problem is solved using Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) based techniques in an on-line fashion to reduce the computational complexity. We leverage Twin-delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) to solve the problem by considering the UAV trajectory as a set of continuous actions. For comparison, we also use the Soft Actor-Critic (SAC), Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) and Double Deep Q-Network (DDQN) for continuous and discrete optimization of the UAV trajectory, respectively. Extensive simulations show that the TD3 outperforms all the considered DRL techniques with the highest energy efficiency and throughput, and the lowest propulsion energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207