MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403055402 · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ad8201

Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy using a fused machine learning approach: utilizing radiomics from pretreatment T2W MRI images with clinical and pathological information

2024· article· en· W4403055402 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsGuelph General HospitalUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Guelph
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRadiomicsProstate cancerRadiation therapyPathologicalMedicineArtificial intelligenceMedical physicsCancerComputer scienceRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa) varies widely within standard risk groups. There is a need for low-cost tools to more robustly predict recurrence and personalize therapy. Radiomic features from pretreatment MRI show potential as noninvasive biomarkers for BCR prediction. However, previous research has not fully combined radiomics with clinical and pathological data to predict BCR in PCa patients following radiotherapy.
Purpose: This study aims to predict 5-year BCR using radiomics from pretreatment T2W MRI and clinical-pathological data in PCa patients treated with radiation therapy, and to develop a unified model compatible with both 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners.
Methods: A total of 150 T2W scans and clinical parameters were preprocessed. Of these, 120 cases were used for training and validation, and 30 for testing. Four distinct machine learning models were developed: Model 1 used radiomics, Model 2 used clinical and pathological data, and Model 3 combined these using late fusion. Model 4 integrated radiomic and clinical-pathological data using early fusion.
Results: Model 1 achieved an AUC of 0.73, while Model 2 had an AUC of 0.64 for predicting outcomes in 30 new test cases. Model 3, using late fusion, had an AUC of 0.69. Early fusion models showed strong potential, with Model 4 reaching an AUC of 0.84, highlighting the effectiveness of the early fusion model.
Conclusions: This study is the first to use a fusion technique for predicting BCR in PCa patients following radiotherapy, utilizing pre-treatment T2W MRI images and clinical-pathological data. The methodology improves predictive accuracy by fusing radiomics with clinical-pathological information, even with a relatively small dataset, and introduces the first unified model for both 1.5T and 3T MRI images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it