MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403199645 · doi:10.3126/fwr.v2i1.70546

Firm Specific Fundamental Variables and Common Stock Returns

2024· article· en· W4403199645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFar Western Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Finance and Governance
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStock (firearms)Common stockEconometricsFinancial economicsEconomicsBusinessMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of the study is to examine the impact of firm specific fundamental variables on cross-section of expected stock returns from the Nepali capital market. The data were collected form the sample of 48 firms actively traded in the Nepal stock exchange (NEPSE) for 12 years from mid-July 2011 to mid-July 2022 with 576 observations. The explained variable is common stock returns and the explanatory variables are firm specific fundamental variables such as market capitalization as proxied by firm size, book to market equity, earning yield and cash flow yield. The study examined that firm size, book to market equity, and earning yield (for only CGY and TY) have the significant negative impact on common stock returns in Nepali capital market. In contrast earning yield has the significant positive impact on dividend yield only. The cash flow yield has no significant impact on common stock returns in Nepali capital market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it