MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403227220 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v9i2.2911

Artificial Intelligence In The Military: An Overview Of The Capabilities, Applications, And Challenges

2022· article· en· W4403227220 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineering ethicsData scienceComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a reality in today's world with the rise of the 4th industrial revolution, especially in the armed forces.Military AI systems can process more data more efectively than traditional systems.Due to its intrinsic computing and decision-making capabilities, AI also increases combat systems' self-control, self-regulation, and self-actuation.Artificial intelligence is used in almost every military application, and increased research and development support from military research agencies to develop new and advanced AI technologies is expected to drive the widespread demand for AI-driven systems in the military.This essay will discuss several AI applications in the military, as well as their capabilities, opportunities, and potential harm and devastation when there is instability.The article looks at current and future potential for developing artificial intelligence algorithms, particularly in military applications.Most of the discussion focused on the seven patterns of AI, the usage and implementation of AI algorithms in the military, object detection, military logistics, and robots, the global instability induced by AI use, and nuclear risk.The article also looks at the current and future potential for developing artificial intelligence algorithms, particularly in military applications.Keywords- IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) has been gradually improving and becoming a more efficient way worldwide with the help of data, computer processing power, and machine learning developments, especially during the last two decades.As a result,.Therefore, it should come as no surprise that AI has many applications in the military sector also, in a vast range [1].Military capability is the current measurement index when determining a country or nation's "Powerforce."The U.S. Department of Defense defines military competence or capability as "the ability to achieve a certain combat objective (win a war or battle, destroy a target set)."It is directly or indirectly influenced by modernization, structure, preparedness, and sustainability.The equipment, arsenal, and level of technical sophistication largely determine the degree of modernization [2].The Internet is replacing the conventional way of initiating war instigated from the start of the Second World War.According to researchers, modern autonomous systems and artificial intelligence (AI) are expected to be crucial in future military confrontations [3].This type of enhancer helps in the military sector in various ways and turns out to be the greatest weapon in developing military capability [4].Data on a wide range of resources and capabilities (human resources combat and support vehicles, helicopters, cutting-edge intelligence, and communication equipment, artillery, and missiles) that can carry out complex tasks of various types, such as intelligence gathering, movements, direct and indirect fires, infrastructure, and transports, should be considered in military decisions [3,5].AI methods, such as qualitative spatial interpretation of CoA diagrams and interleaved adversarial scheduling, and many others likewise enhance the military world in different paths [6].The study has the potential to inform policy and decision-making in this area, particularly in relation to issues such as military modernization and preparedness.The re-search findings could potentially aid in developing guide-lines and regulations for the responsible use of AI in military settings.recall chess pieces better when arranged on a chess board in meaningful patterns than randomly arranged chess pieces [32, 33].It has been demonstrated that people skilled in reading architectural plans, reading circuit diagrams, and deciphering X-ray images have the best ability to spot important patterns in those fields [34, 35].Therefore, it appears logical to speculate that the capacity to recognize key battlefield patterns is at least one element of the battle command experience.1.1.Conversational Pattern.Over the years, various cutting-edge solutions have been created based on one of the most general conversational AI patterns.The modern workplace of the twenty-first century is filled with social robots and AIaugmented living helpers.In many industries, including the military, the significance of interactions between humans and robots is becoming increasingly apparent.With AI technology's help, this interaction is termed as conversational pattern.This is characterized as conversational forms of engagement and information spread across various mediums,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.316
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.015 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it