Federated Learning Approach for Collaborative and Secure Smart Healthcare Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Across all periods of human history, the importance attributed to health has remained a fundamental and significant facet. This statement holds greater validity within the present context. The pressing demand for healthcare solutions with real-time capabilities, affordability, and high precision is crucial in medical research and technology progress. In recent times, there has been a significant advancement in emerging technologies such as AI, IoT, blockchain, and edge computing. These breakthrough developments have led to the creation of various intelligent applications. Smart healthcare applications can be realized by combining robust AI detection and prediction capabilities with edge computing architecture, which offers low computing costs and latency. In this paper, we begin by conducting a literature review of AI-assisted EC-based smart healthcare applications from the past three years. Our goal is to identify gaps and barriers in this field. We propose a smart healthcare architecture model that integrates AI technology into the edge. Finally, we summarize the challenges and research directions associated with the proposed model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it