MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403321425 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133393

Global sensitivity analysis of nuclear district heating reactor primary heat exchanger and pressure vessel optimization

2024· article· en· W4403321425 on OpenAlexaff
Jussi Saari, Mariia Kozlova, Heikki Suikkanen, Ekaterina Sermyagina, Juhani Hyvärinen, Julian Scott Yeomans

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersBusiness FinlandLiikesivistysrahasto
KeywordsNuclear engineeringHeat exchangerSensitivity (control systems)Pressure vesselNuclear reactorReactor pressure vesselEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, small modular reactors (SMRs) have received greater interest as a source for clean and affordable district heating (DH). Compared to power plants, the low-pressure, low-temperature design and nearly 100% efficiency reduce the cost of produced energy considerably. However, few practical implementations exist yet, and cost estimates and design principles are subject to uncertainties whose interactions remain largely unknown. In this work, we present a techno-economic optimization and sensitivity analysis of a natural circulation DH SMR primary heat exchanger. A Cuckoo Search variant augmented with a modified Hooke-Jeeves search was used as the optimizer, with SimDec (simulation decomposition) subsequently employed for global sensitivity analysis. The reactor pressure vessel and containment vessel specific costs exhibited the greatest impact on the cost of heat and the optimized configurations. While low-pressure, low-temperature design is central to heating reactor cost-effectiveness, optimized primary circuit temperatures clearly exceeded previous assumptions. In a 5260 full-load hours mid-load application, a 34-41 €/MWh cost range was found for produced heat at 8% interest and 20-year lifetime. For heat exchanger optimization, the results indicate the potential for considerable performance improvement from using deterministic local search for terminal convergence and sensitivity analysis for dimensionality reduction. • Small heating reactor appears an affordable source of clean district heating • Pressure vessel specific costs important for cost of heat and optimized design • Novel approach combines global sensitivity analysis and engineering optimization • Dimensionality reduction and local terminal search for performance improvement • SimDec tool reveals interaction of decision variables and uncertainties

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergySame topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207